In a recent thought-provoking session at the EAO online Congress held in Geneva, renowned experts Vincent Fehmer, a master dental technician, and Professor Daniel Edelhoff delved into the ongoing debate between digital and conventional technologies in dental restoration. The discourse, intriguingly termed a "battle," was not about competing experts but rather the methodologies they represent.
The Evolution from Conventional to Digital Vincent Fehmer opened the discussion by highlighting the transformative shift from traditional methods, like the lost wax technique, to digital workflows that are increasingly dominating dental laboratories. The advent of zirconia as a preferred material has revolutionized how dental restorations are approached, moving away from physical models to digital impressions captured directly from the patient.
This shift necessitates a deep understanding of new technologies such as 3D printing, which Fehmer pointed out, is more than just operating a machine. It requires a profound knowledge of material handling, positioning, and post-processing to ensure high-quality outcomes.
The Hybrid Dentist’s Perspective Professor Daniel Edelhoff described himself as a "hybrid dentist," utilizing both analog and digital methods. He emphasized the lab's role in digital transformation, noting that while certain steps like tooth preparation may remain traditional, the fabrication of restorations benefits immensely from digital capabilities. Technologies like intraoral scanning allow for immediate digitalization, which can be particularly effective in creating restorations using materials that are otherwise inaccessible through conventional methods.
Practical Implications and Challenges The session explored the practical applications of these technologies in dental labs and clinics. Fehmer discussed the critical role of 3D printing, stressing that any modern lab must integrate this technology to remain competitive. This integration impacts not only the types of materials used but also the speed and efficiency of creating dental restorations.
Professor Edelhoff highlighted the challenges and limitations still faced, particularly in creating permanent restorations with current 3D printing technologies. Both experts agreed that while the future of dental restoration is inevitably digital, there is an essential need for continued innovation and improvement in the materials and techniques used.
Conclusion: Embracing the Future The consensus from the discussion underscored a need for dental professionals to embrace digital technologies while recognizing the value and applicability of conventional methods where appropriate. The future of dental restoration lies in a balanced approach that leverages the best of both worlds, ensuring that patient care remains at the forefront of technological advancements.
As the dental field continues to evolve, these insights from leading experts provide a roadmap for integrating new technologies into clinical practice, ensuring that dental professionals can navigate the changing landscape effectively. This integration not only enhances the efficiency and quality of dental restorations but also improves the overall patient experience by offering quicker and more reliable solutions to dental health issues.